I've just noticed this issue (or a similar one). On Firefox 12, if I click on an image thumbnail, the main image fades up & then extremely quickly the image disappears and reappears (this effect appears as a flicker just after complete fade in). If I use the keyboard, I don't see this effect (due to the 'slide' action). Occasionally however, I do not see this flicker when I click on a thumbnail. I guess it might be a memory issue.

I don't see this on IE9.

Edit: I just checked John's gallery (which has no thumbnails to click) and occasionally, I noticed the same issue. It's the same issue I reported above, and if IE9 is used, the flicker is not present.

Sorry, should have said. Using Firefox v12.

No thumbnails. I use slideshow pro at the moment without thumbnails, so was trying for a like for like look.

Thanks for the attention you are giving my enquiry.

J.

I've got this same issue viewing my gallery on an iPad   I thought it was due to my slow Internet connection

http://www.keithlevitphotography.com/gl … /imagine5/

Comments?

Hello,
I'm having the exact same issue on my computer running Win7 x64 and firefox 18.
I tried with juicebox lite v1.2 on my computer.
I'd like to buy it but have this is quite a big problem.
It's doing it with my own galleries and on this demo too (when clicking on thumbnails : http://www.juicebox.net/demos/lite/full/

Thanks for your reply

I would like some clarification on selling points from the Juicebox Website

I understand that all browsers render css and java script code slightly different. And with every change of configuration (Juicebox) or browser update, you are running the risk of experiencing new bugs / conflicts.

Yesterday I added caption for a client and I was not able to navigate with the thumbs anymore - some table of the caption was above the thumbs and changing the css z-index in the theme fortunately  fixed it.

Not to mention bugs that have not been fixed like a broken gallery on opera mini - simplevier works just fine on opera mini by the way!

The features that Juicebox promises are fantastic and working for the most part, I understand that you can not predict future rendering of Browsers but I am wondering about future support and bug fixes  of Juicebox 1 once 2.0 or the next gallery is released.

Felix claimed

I understand

All I know is that I successfully upgraded simpleviewer.js with juicebox.js. 

I am under the impression that this Juicebox Gallery is future proof, all of the offered configuration options work across all the major browser you listed on the Juicebox website (and bugs will be addressed and fixed in a timely manner) , and there would be no need to upgrade if I am satisfied with the current configuration options since they are future proof.